|

G. H.
Lang was born November 20, 1874 in London, England. He died at Wimborne,
Dorset, England October 20, 1958. He was saved at a young age when he
was seven and a half years old. His writings include fourteen major
books and innumerable booklets. He once said, "No man should write
a book until he is forty. He needs to prove his theories in practice
before publishing." All but nine of his many books were published
after he was fifty years old.
A
TRIBUTE
Having known Mr. G. H. Lang for
nearly 60 years I am glad to be given the opportunity of paying a
tribute to his memory; in doing so I desire only to ‘magnify the grace
of God’ in him.
First, I would say, that over the
years I have been growing conscious of his deep spirituality; he was one
of those rare souls who really lived in heaven; he found himself truly
to be ‘a stranger and a pilgrim on the earth’. His ‘city home’
was in heaven from which he saw himself to be sent to this world as an
ambassador for Christ. He was completely devoid of any earthly
nationalism -- it mattered little to him where he was down here, except
that he should be in the place of Christ’s choosing for the moment; so
from time to time he was found in many countries on the service of his
Lord, now enduring the scorching heat of Arabian deserts, now the
freezing cold of Russian steppes; he was equally content to be posted by
his Sovereign in some primitive village of ‘the pensive East’, or in
some great city of the West with all its modern amenities. Thus he
roamed the world, Christ’s ‘ambassador at large’, beseeching
sinners to be reconciled to God.
He was essentially a man of faith,
never looking to man for the means of his subsistence, but only to his
heavenly Father, and faith grew with its exercise. In this school, like
his great predecessor, he learned in whatsoever state he was therewith
to be content; he learned the secret of how to run low and how to run
over. And he was such a man of faith because he was such a man of
prayer; his prayers were always unusual and as inspiring as they were
unique; he spoke with an intimacy to his heavenly Father as one who knew
but whose intimacy was the very soul of reverence.
I think I may truthfully say that
he was the most apostolic man I have ever met; perhaps for that very
reason he was a very controversial figure; a correspondent suggested to
me that he was the most controversial figure in brethren circles since
J.N. Darby; yet it would be true to say that he himself was not a
controversialist. A very close student of the Word, and an independent
thinker, he was not prepared to take traditional interpretations unless
he was personally convinced that they were right. Though completely
convinced of the eternal security of the believer, many of his views on
prophecy led him into avenues of thought and teaching where a great
number of us felt unable to follow. Unfortunately this closed doors to
his otherwise extremely valuable ministry. Perhaps one of the greatest
teachers of his time, multitudes could testify to the great help they
have received from him, either from his public utterances or from his
numerous writings.
It was only to be in his presence
to realize that one was in the presence of a true saint of God whose
holy life gave weight and authority to all he taught.
From our midst has gone ‘a
prince and a great man’; he has been an ensample to the flock. If we
cannot follow all he taught, we may well follow his faith, and like him,
come to the Scriptures with an open mind and teachable heart, ever
keeping before us that day, quickly coming, when differences of judgment
will have disappeared for ever and when ‘we shall know even as we are
known’.
Douglas W. Brealey
The Witness, December 1958
|