|
Chapter
1
PRINCIPLES THAT
SHOULD GOVERN IN THE
INTERPRETATION OF PROPHECY
Our object
in the present series of papers is to bring before our readers some
results of recent studies of the prophecy of The Seventy Weeks (Daniel
9), and of the Lord's discourse on Mount Olivet (Matthew 24, Mark 13,
Luke 21), in which He applied and expanded a part of that prophecy.
Writings and
addresses on prophecy always excite interest, because they appeal to the
element of curiosity which is prominent in human nature. But such
writings and addresses are of benefit only so far as they rightly
interpret the Scripture. In the case of unfulfilled prophecy this is
oftentimes a matter of difficulty; while on the other hand writers on
prophetic themes are under constant temptation to indulge in Surmises
and speculations, and even in flights of imagination. Much has been put
forth as interpretation of prophecy which is utterly unproved, but which
could not be disproved except, as in cases where dates have been
set for the coming of Christ, by the event itself.
Another fact which
has been impressed upon us in this connection is that there has been no
progress in the interpretation of unfulfilled prophecy for a good
many years. At "prophetic conferences," and in books and
magazines, the same things are being repeated today, with little
variation, that were said two decades ago. It would seem that, for some
reason, the Lord has not been, of late, shedding fresh light upon this
part of His precious Word. Our own thought about the matter is that
writers on prophecy have gone so far in advancing, and the people of God
in accepting, mere conjectures, unproved theories, or at best mere
probabilities, as interpretations of the prophetic Scriptures, that
there must needs be a surrender of our speculative ideas, and a retracing
of some of our steps (which have diverged from the truth), ere there
can be any real advance in the understanding of this part of the Word of
God.
Having these
things in mind, we purpose, in entering upon the present line of
studies, to be governed by certain principles which, we believe, should
control at all times those who assume to expound the Word of God to
their fellow saints.
The first of these
controlling principles is, neither to accept nor to give forth as
settled interpretation anything that rests upon surmise or mere
probability; but only what is supported either by direct proof from
Scripture, or by reasonable deduction therefrom. We maintain that it is
far better to have no explanation at all of a difficult passage
than to accept one which may turn out to be wrong. For it is not easy to
give up an idea when once we have committed ourselves to it.
In fact, that
which chiefly stands in the way of the acceptance of fresh light and
truth from the Scriptures is the strong (in some cases almost
invincible) reluctance of the human mind to surrender, or even to
examine the ground of, opinions which possibly were originally accepted
upon human authority only, and without any inquiry as to the support
which can be found for them in the Word of God.
Another guiding
principle is that the proof adduced in support of any interpretation
should be taken from the Scripture itself. Our conviction is
that, whatever information is essential for the interpretation of any
and every passage of Scripture is to be found somewhere in the Bible
itself. Were it not so the Holy Scriptures would not be able to make
the man of God perfect, that is to say, complete, and
thoroughly furnished unto every good work (2 Tim. 3:16, 17). We must, of
course, appeal to history in order to show the fulfilment of
prophecy; for it cannot be shown in any other way. But the
interpretation of Scripture is another matter.
Furthermore,
wherever we offer a statement or opinion to the reader for his
acceptance, we feel bound to give along with it the proofs by
which we deem it to be established. This should be demanded of every
writer. But, most unhappily, there are now in circulation many books
dealing with Bible subjects, whose authors deem themselves to be such
high "authorities" that they habitually make assertions of the
most radical sort without citing in support thereof any proof whatever.
We earnestly caution our readers to beware of all such. It is not
according to the mind of God that His people should rest upon any human
"authorities" whatever. His own Word is the only authority.
These papers are
prepared for the benefit of "the common people." What we
undertake by the grace of God to do is to make every statement and
conclusion so plain, and to support it by such clear proof from the
Scriptures alone, that the ordinary reader will be able both to see
for himself the meaning of the passage, and also to comprehend perfectly
the scriptural evidence by which that meaning is established. Thus he
will be entirely independent of all human "authority."
This is an exceedingly
important point. For, as matters now stand, it would be difficult or
impossible to find any one whose view of the Seventy Weeks prophecy does
not rest, as to some one or more essential features thereof, upon mere
human authority. In our own case, when we began these studies (about May
1921) our opinion (in regard especially to the Chronology of the
prophetic period) had no better basis than that such were the views of
certain eminent writers on Bible-topics; and this was most
unsatisfactory, because we knew that there were other equally eminent
students of the Bible who held an entirely different view. But now we
are in no uncertainty. We have solid ground under our feet; for every
conclusion rests upon the unshakable rock of God's own testimony. This
is as it should be.
We wish
particularly to impress upon our readers that the proofs furnished by
the Scriptures for our comprehension of this great and marvelous
prophecy are not hard to understand or to apply. On the contrary they
are quite simple. On a moment's reflection it will be seen that it could
not be otherwise. For the Scriptures were written, not for the erudite,
but for the simple-minded. Our Lord said, speaking of this very
prophecy, "Whoso readeth, let him understand" (Matt. 24:15);
and it should not surprise us to find that all the materials needed
for our understanding of the matter are contained in the Bible itself.
Bible
Chronology. Prior to the publication of Martin Anstey's great work
in 1913, all the existing systems of Bible Chronology were dependent,
for the period of time embraced by the Seventy Weeks, upon sources of
information outside the Bible, and which are, moreover, not only
unsupported by proof, but are in conflict with the Scriptures. Anstey's
system has the unique merit of being based on the Bible alone.
Therefore it is capable of being verified by all Bible readers. But for
the prophecy of the Seventy Weeks there is no need to resort to any
system of chronology, seeing that the prophecy contains its own
chronology. In fact the difficulties and confusion which have arisen
in connection with this prophecy are due in large measure to the attempt
to make it conform to an incorrect chronology.
A PROPHECY OF
TRANSCENDENT INTEREST
The Scripture we
are now about to study is one of the most marvellous and most
transcendently important in the Word of God. That which is of supreme
interest in it is the divinely-revealed time-measure, starting from the
return of the Israelites out of Babylonian historical event second in
importance only to the Exodus from Egypt- down to the culminating event
of all prophecy and all history, even "unto Messiah," and to
His being "cut off and having nothing."
The very nature of
the things here revealed is a guaranty that, in the Scriptures
themselves, will be found everything that is needed for a
right and clear understanding thereof; and further that the whole matter
lies within the comprehension of ordinary saints. All we ask of
our readers is their prayerful attention to the Scriptures to which we
shall refer. Upon that sole condition we can confidently promise them
that they will be well able to understand every matter advanced, and to
see for themselves whether it be supported by the Word of God or not.
Finally we desire
to say that the conclusions we have reached involve nothing (unless in
respect to some minor details) that has not been pointed out by sound
Bible expositors of other days. This, however, we were (in some
important particulars) unaware of until our studies were completed; for
while they were in progress we consulted no human authorities except
Anstey's Bible Chronology, mentioned above.
If any of our
readers should find themselves in disagreement as to any of the matters
set forth herein, we would ask of such only a patient examination of the
proofs advanced, together with that measure of kindly toleration which
is to be expected in such cases amongst those who are, with equal
sincerity, seeking to know the mind of God.
"DANIEL THE
PROPHET" (Matt. 24:15)
The book of Daniel
differs in marked particulars from all others. The miraculous element
abounds in it; and because of this it has been within recent years an
object of venomous attack by the enemies of truth. Furthermore, the
communications found in it are not, like other prophecies, in the nature
of exhortations and warnings to the people of that time; for Daniel was
not (like the other prophets), the messenger of God to the people of
Daniel's own day. They are, on the contrary, in the nature of Divine revelations,
given to Daniel, either in the form of visions, or of messages direct
from heaven. It does not appear that they were communicated to the
people of that day. Thus the book is seen to be not for the people of
Daniel's own time, but for those of a later period or periods. Here is a
very marked difference between the prophecies of Daniel, and all others.
Moreover, the book
of Daniel has to do in a very special way with Christ; and to
this feature we would call particular attention. Christ Himself is
distinctly seen in it, once in earth in the midst of the burning fiery
furnace, delivering the men who trusted in their God (3:25); and once in
heaven, receiving an everlasting Kingdom (7:13, 14). And beyond all else
in interest and importance is the fact that to Daniel was given the
exact measure of time from an event clearly marked in his own day-
an event for which he had fervently prayed- to the coming of Christ,
and to His being "cut off." Moreover, in this
connection God revealed to Daniel the marvelous things which were to be
accomplished through the crucifixion of Christ, as well as the
overwhelming judgments-the "desolations"- far surpassing
anything of like nature theretofore- which were to fall upon the City,
the Sanctuary and the People, in consequence of their rejection and
crucifixion of Christ.
In respect to
these remarkable and immensely important features the book of Daniel
stands in a class by itself.
Moreover, this
book contains, not only predictions that were to be fulfilled at the
first coming of Christ, but also predictions relating to the end of the
present age. For we have in the vision of the great image of gold,
silver, brass, iron and clay, recorded in chapter 2, an outline of the
course of human history from Daniel's own time down to the second coming
of Christ in power and glory; and the breadth of the prophecy is such
that it embraces the chief political changes of the whole world.
It is doubtless
because of the unique character and importance of this book that it has
been so fiercely attacked within recent times, and that every attempt
has been made to raise a doubt as, to its authenticity; for great
efforts have been made to convince the people in general that it was not
written by Daniel, or in his day. Those attempts have conspicuously
failed; but the efforts of the adversary to discredit this book are
still to be seen in the crude interpretations, miscalculations, and
fantastical views which have been poured forth in this day, now that it
has become a matter of importance to "understand" these
prophecies.
An intimation of
the efforts that would be made to becloud the prophecy of Daniel is
found in the words of Christ when, in referring directly to that
prophecy, he said, "Whoso readeth let him understand"
(Matt. 24:15). But those words may also be taken as an encouragement to
seek a right understanding of that wonderful series of
prophecies.
The chief interest
of our study centers in the revelation given to Daniel in the first year
of the Medo-Persian empire, and found in the ninth chapter; and it is to
this prophecy of prophecies that we wish to direct attention at the
present time. It is generally known as the prophecy of the Seventy
Weeks (Dan. 9:24-27).
The setting of
this prophecy should first be carefully noted. Daniel had learned,
through Jeremiah 25:11, and 29:10, that the period which God had set for
the "desolations of Jerusalem" was just seventy years (Dan.
9:1). That period was then about to expire; for the decree, whereby the
captivity was ended and the Jews were allowed (and even exhorted) to
return to their land and city, was issued by, Cyrus within two years
(Ezra 1:1). That this was the fulfilment of Jeremiah's prophecy is
certainly known, because it is recorded in Ezra 1:1, that the Lord
stirred up the spirit of Cyrus to issue that decree, for the express
purpose that "the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah
might be fulfilled." This is surpassingly wonderful and impressive.
The effect upon
Daniel of receiving this revelation was to send him to his knees in
confession and prayer. His prayer should be carefully examined. It will
be seen that it has to do entirely with the city, the sanctuary,
and the people of God, with special reference to the
"desolations" of the city. It will be seen also that
these same subjects are what occupy the prophecy which the angel
Gabriel brought to Daniel in response to his prayer. We call special
attention to this, and also to the following points of interest:
1. God's response to Daniel's prayer was in
the form of a revelation brought to him by the angel Gabriel, who
stated, as the first item of information, that the seventy years
of captivity were to be followed by a period of seventy sevens (of
years). The word here rendered "weeks" is literally
"sevens"; so there is no doubt that the period designated in
this prophecy is seventy sevens of years- 490 years.
2. The decree which was to bring the
captivity to an end by freeing the Jews, granting them liberty to return
to their own land and to rebuild the city and sanctuary, was to be also the
starting point of the "determined" period of seventy sevens of
years. This is clearly seen from the prophecy itself in connection
with Ezra 1:1 and other Scriptures hereafter referred to; and it is
important- indeed necessary in order to avoid being misled- that
we grasp this fact and keep it in mind. So we repeat that the
epoch-making decree of Cyrus in the first year of his reign (as sole
king), in virtue of which the city and temple were rebuilt under
Zerubbabel and Joshua, was both the termination of the 70
years captivity and also the starting point for the prophetic
period of 70 sevens, which had been "determined," or
measured out, in the councils of heaven, upon the people and the holy
city. Where the one period was to end, the other (just seven times as
long) was to begin. Again we ask that this point be carefully noted.
Full proof of its correctness will be given in our next chapter.
3. Daniel had, in his player, confessed the
sins of his people, for which sins God had brought upon them the
"desolations" of their city and sanctuary. But, to his intense
grief no doubt, the angel Gabriel revealed to him that a far more
terrible sin, the very culmination of the sins of the people, was
yet to be committed by them. This was to happen within the period
"determined" by the prophecy; and moreover, in consequence
thereof, a judgment far more severe was to fall upon them, even
the utter destruction of the city and sanctuary, the sweeping away of
the nation as "with a flood," and "desolations" of
age-long duration. No wonder eve find Daniel, in the third year of
Cyrus, still mourning and fasting three full weeks, and lamenting that
his comeliness was turned in him into corruption (10:2, 3, 8).
Daniel had said in
his prayer, "Yea, all Israel have transgressed" (v.
11). An evident response to this is seen in the words of Gabriel,
"seventy weeks are determined upon thy people to finish the
transgression." With this we may compare the words of Christ,
spoken to the leaders of Israel, just before the Olivet discourse: "Fill
ye up then the measure of your fathers" (Matt. 23:32). They did
so by rejecting and crucifying Him.
4. The most important feature of the
revelation brought by Gabriel to Daniel was the precise measure of
time (69 sevens, or 483 years) "to Messiah, THE
PRINCE"; and the time when Messiah was to be "cut off and
have nothing." This is the wonder of wonders, the prophecy of
prophecies.
5. The angel Gabriel, who brought these
marvelous predictions to Daniel, is the same who announced the approach
of the fulfilment of them to Zacharias and to Mary (Lu. 1:11-19; 26).
6. The expression used by Gabriel to
Daniel, "thou art greatly beloved," is the exact equivalent of
the word addressed by the same messenger to Mary- "thou art highly
favoured" (Anstley's Bible Chronology, p. 276). Mr. Anstley says of
this expression: "It is used three times to Daniel, and never to
anyone else except Mary; and Gabriel is the only angel employed to make
known to men the revelation of the mystery of redemption."
7. The revelation embraces two main
subjects (a) the coming and cutting off of the Messiah, (b) the
destruction and "desolation" of the City and Sanctuary. It is
a fact very familiar to all readers of the Bible, that Christ Jesus
called this prophecy to the minds of His disciples on the eve of His
being "cut off," and definitely announced to them at that time
the approaching destruction and "desolation" of Jerusalem and
the Temple (Matt. 24:1-22; Lu. 21:20-24).
In these seven
points we have the main elements for a right understanding of the
prophecy.
Introduction |
Chapter 1
| Chapter 2 |
Chapter 3 |
Chapter 4
Chapter 5 |
Chapter 6 |
Chapter 7 |
Chapter 8 |
Chapter 9 |
Chapter 10
Chapter 11 |
Chapter 12
| Chapter 13 |
Chapter 14
| Chapter 15
Chapter 16 |
Appendix |
<<< Return to Other Works
|